<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	> <channel><title>Comments on: VirtualBox 2.1 new features</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ideaexcursion.com/2008/12/17/virtualbox-21-new-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ideaexcursion.com/2008/12/17/virtualbox-21-new-features/</link> <description>Technology Musings</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:04:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Preview: VirtualBox 3.0 Beta 1 &#124; Idea Excursion</title><link>http://www.ideaexcursion.com/2008/12/17/virtualbox-21-new-features/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link> <dc:creator>Preview: VirtualBox 3.0 Beta 1 &#124; Idea Excursion</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:47:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideaexcursion.com/?p=110#comment-219</guid> <description>[...] I went about checking 3D performance in other ways, specifically demos. My first stop was QtGears, glxgears for Qt. Even on my paltry hardware, I received approximately 750FPS. Running the same benchmark with 3D Acceleration off returned a speed of about 300FPS. Clearly, the OpenGL is working, as it was initially implemented back in VirtualBox 2.1.0. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I went about checking 3D performance in other ways, specifically demos. My first stop was QtGears, glxgears for Qt. Even on my paltry hardware, I received approximately 750FPS. Running the same benchmark with 3D Acceleration off returned a speed of about 300FPS. Clearly, the OpenGL is working, as it was initially implemented back in VirtualBox 2.1.0. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Overview: VirtualBox 2.2.0 &#124; Idea Excursion</title><link>http://www.ideaexcursion.com/2008/12/17/virtualbox-21-new-features/comment-page-1/#comment-164</link> <dc:creator>Overview: VirtualBox 2.2.0 &#124; Idea Excursion</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:36:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideaexcursion.com/?p=110#comment-164</guid> <description>[...] Sun released an update to their cross-platform virtualization software, VirtualBox. 2.2.0 introduces some evolutionary changes that, while worthwhile, are not quite as exciting as the 2.1.0 release. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sun released an update to their cross-platform virtualization software, VirtualBox. 2.2.0 introduces some evolutionary changes that, while worthwhile, are not quite as exciting as the 2.1.0 release. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Windows 7 in VirtualBox: Shared Folders workaround &#124; Idea Excursion</title><link>http://www.ideaexcursion.com/2008/12/17/virtualbox-21-new-features/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link> <dc:creator>Windows 7 in VirtualBox: Shared Folders workaround &#124; Idea Excursion</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:22:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ideaexcursion.com/?p=110#comment-58</guid> <description>[...] releases. As for the guest OS, you&#8217;ll need to have some sort of networking enabled. With the revamped host networking in 2.1, I highly recommend you use that if at all [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] releases. As for the guest OS, you&#8217;ll need to have some sort of networking enabled. With the revamped host networking in 2.1, I highly recommend you use that if at all [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: www.ideaexcursion.com @ 2012-02-07 08:24:11 by W3 Total Cache -->
